Case Study #5displayed a point of Racism and prejudice — Violating the 12th Ethic — attacking someone in a safe environment who reached out to help Case Study #5.
I assumed the role of “Stern Mother/Instructor” emphasizing, “You behaved poorly. You owe this lady who tried to help you an apology.”
Case Study #5 entered under evaluation with Lab QED where we analyzed how best to proceed. I used my work of The Narcissist Cure and The Liar’s Fallacy to predict every action Case Study #5 took, allowing me to Navigate the entire situation flawlessly. Lab QED supported my conclusions.
Case Study #5 attempted to play “Victim” and provide “Reasoning,” which was — in fact — Logical Fallacy and thus, was without Reason.
Case Study #5 violated the 7th Ethic.
I replied sternly, “You behaved poorly. Your reasons are not relevant. Only Accountability matters.”
Case Study #5 violated the 5th Ethic, then violated the 6th Ethic by talking down to me, accusing me of being in the wrong. She tried again to give reason for Abuse. Violating the 11th Ethic.
Lab QED and I concluded that they sought the Advantage, and resolved to violate Logic to do it, to provide reason to Avoid the 5th Ethic.
I continued to Deny Audience to anyone who refuses to Learn.
Battle for their Delusion of Possessing The Advantage that they don’t have. That is really what she was fighting for.
The more she fought for this Delusion, the more I withdrew, “I am not available for your Audience,” I repeated.
It was the Use of Abused Logic to “Justify” — give Reason — for Poor and Abusive Behavior, as if to say, “It is okay that I behaved poorly. I had to because…”
She never denied behaving poorly. She only gave excuse why she had to.
This itself is an Admission of Guilt.
This is when I realized, there is no Logic in Unethics. Those who are Unethical, however, bastardize Logic to “justify” their Cruelty and Abuse. This Bastardized use of Logic to “justify” cruelty communicates to their Ego and the World that , “I have no lesson to learn for I was right to be Cruel and Unethical, and thus it was Okay for me to be Uenthical.” They have missed the Ethical Lesson to be learned.
When people allow the Unethical to “explain” or “provide reason” to their Cruelty, this implies that there is ever “Reason For Cruelty,” and this is at the Heart of every Criminal.
“There is reason for Cruelty, and thus Cruelty is permitted and accepted under these circumstances.”
However, according to The 12 Ethics, Cruelty, Ignorance, or Abuse is never a reason for Cruelty, Ignorance, or Abuse because this creates Circular Reasoning.
Circular Reasoning is Catch-22, and is, by default, without Logic or Reasoning.
Thus, the Ethical, Parent, or Teacher should use The 12 Ethics to assess what is Ethical or Unethical and also, Deny Audience to The Abuser/Criminal/Offender unless and until the Abuser/Criminal/Offender accepts the 5th Ethic, the 6th Ethic, and the 7th Ethic.
Without the 5th, 6th, and 7th Ethic, The Abuser/Criminal/Offender will never Humble Themselves to Submit to Learn.
We do not give Audience as reward to Abuser/Criminal/Offender, nor do we give Credible Claims of Sanity” to Insane behavior. This is where Civilization comes to an End.